Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereLaw Offices of Kenneth Wincorn P.C. | Kenneth Wincorn
You need an attorney to deal with this in most instances. He will have to determine who is responsible, possibly through the work of experts on causation.
Answer Applies to: Texas
Replied: 11/15/2011
Ewusiak & Roberts, P.A. | Christopher J. Roberts
If the balcony was not sufficiently robust to handle foreseeable use, it could be the fault of the builder or architect. It could also be the fault of whomever over-stressed the balcony. Or all of the above. You should talk to a lawyer in your area who can ask more specific questions to determine who may be liable for the accident.
Answer Applies to: Florida
Replied: 2/17/2012
R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
Fault is determined by who breach their duty of ordinary care. The standard is what a reasonable person, similarly situated would have done or refrained from doing.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 11/15/2011
Dwyer, Black & Lyle, LLP | Kevin Habberfield
The homeowner is responsible to make sure they provide a safe premises to all guests and has a non-delegable duty to do so. That means, they cannot claim it is someone else's fault in the first instance but, they may be able to seek contribution/indemnity from another party if they feel they contributed to the crash in some way (overcrowding?). Good luck.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 11/15/2011
David F. Stoddard | David F. Stoddard
You ask who is at fault. I am going to assume you mean "who is liable?" Plus, I am not sure if you are asking who is liable for the property damage (the loss of the balcony) or personal injuries to the guests. Either way, I don't have enough information to give a definite answer. If there was something defective in the construction of the balcony, the builer could be liable. If the homeowners allowed too many people on to the balcony, the homeowners might be liable for any personal injuries, although the homeowner would have a potential comparative (contributory) negligence defense against claims of guests in that the guests willingly encountered this known risk (ie. It should have been as obvious to the guests as it was to the homeowner that there were too many people on the deck). If the guests were minors, it might be more difficult, but not impossible, to argue contributory negligence. Children who encounter a hazard may be held to a lower standard than adults encountering the same hazard. For example, children playing near an exposed power line may not be considered to be guilty of contributory negligence, whereas adults messing around with exposed power lines might be. If the guests were there without the homeowners permission (for example if the homeowners' children threw a party without parental consent), then it becomes more difficult to hold the homeowners liable. If the guests were trespassers, the homeowners almost certainly are not liable. If the homeowner's children threw a party, then any injured guests would need to argue that the homeowners were negligent in leaving the children home unsupervised, or argue that the children's conduct is imputed to the homeowners as agents of the homeowners. I believe the homeowners would likely be liable for the children's actions in this scenario because the homeowners left the children in charge of the household. There really is no clear cut answer to your question, in my opinion.
Answer Applies to: South Carolina
Replied: 11/15/2011
Bernard Huff, Attorney/Mediator | Bernard Huff
More specific facts are needed to determine liability. The homeowner and/or the person who planned the gathering of the people and added the furniture on the balcony should consult with an accident attorney for specific legal advice.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 11/15/2011
Andrew T. Velonis, P.C. | Andrew Velonis
The people who overstressed the balcony are at fault because they're the ones who overstressed the balcony.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 11/15/2011
The Margolis Firm | Charles J. Candiano
You answered your own question. You said that furniture and guests caused the collapse. Who was responsible for moving the furniture and inviting the guests? They are responsible. Consult a personal injury attorney immediately if you were injured.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 11/15/2011
Lombardi Law Firm | Steve Lombardi
That's an interesting question with no simple answer. There could be multiple people who are legally responsible. The contractor that built it, the contractor that repaired it, the homeowner, the people that sold the house, the person or persons responsible for having the party. The list can long and requires an investigation as well as knowing how many people were on the balcony, what they were doing, how much weight was on the balcony, how it was constructed, when it was constructed and by who. Answer those questions and it's a start.
Answer Applies to: Iowa
Replied: 11/15/2011
The Law Firm of Reed & Mansfield | Jonathan C. Reed
This is a difficult question to answer w/o knowing more facts. Possible defendants include the homeowner, the builder, the architect, various sub-contractors and whoever was in charge of the house at the time of the incident.
Answer Applies to: Nevada
Replied: 11/15/2011
The Law Office of Eric R. Chandler, P.C., L.L.O. | Eric R. Chandler
Assuming you had permission to be on the property, it sounds like a homeowner's insurance issue.
Answer Applies to: Nebraska
Replied: 11/15/2011
Broad Law Firm, LLC | Donald K. Broad
In Indiana, if the balcony was constructed no more than 10 years ago, you could pursue the company that constructed the balcony. You would have to show that the builder did something negligent in constructing it. You might be able to pursue the homeowner as well, since they are the property owner. However, I think you will have a hard time getting past the fact that the balcony was over-filled as that would likely be the fault of the people on the balcony.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 2/17/2012
Law Office of Jared Altman | Jared Altman
The architect is. This is if it didn't handle the load it was designed for provided that it was built to his specifications.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 11/15/2011
The Law Office of Stephen R. Chesley, LLC | Stephen R. Chesley
The owner of a private residence is usually responsible for any actions that occur on their property. For a negligence claim to exist, the danger of collapsing must be known to them and if said is know and they do nothing to correct it and someone is harmed then their may be a negligence claim.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 11/14/2011
Oliver Law Office | Jami Oliver
You must first determine the "cause" of the balcony falling. There are certain building code requirements that a balcony withstand a certain amount of weight. If it was beyond that weight, then clearly the builder/homeowner/architect probably is not liable for the failure. However, if the balcony was not kept in good condition and was not holding the weight that it was designed and required to hold, then the person in control of the premises would potentially be responsible. As for the homeowner not being home at the time, the answer would depend upon who was in "charge" of the premises. Was it a minor child? A friend? The standard in Ohio and in most states is that persons must use "reasonable care" not to harm another. So the answer as to whether the homeowner is responsible for the added weight and furniture depends on what the homeowner knew or should have known at the time of the incident.
Answer Applies to: Ohio
Replied: 11/14/2011
Mishkind Law Firm, Co., L.P.A. | Howard Mishkind
It depends upon a number of factors. If the homeowners knew or had reason to know that the balcony had a weight limit and failed to warn the guests then the homeowner would be liable. If the homeowner did not know of the defect and the occupants were guests of the homeowner it is unlikely that the homeowner would be liable for any injuries that occurred especially if the number of occupants and the excessive amount of furniture occurred without the knowledge and consent of the homeowner. The actual facts of this incident will determine who may be held liable if anyone.
Answer Applies to: Ohio
Replied: 11/14/2011
Adler Law Group, LLC | Lawrence Adler
If the premises is new the builder may be at fault. The premises owner is responsible if the knew or should have known of a defect or misuse over weight limits. The party organizers may be at fault if the didn't monitor reasonable weights that they should have known about. The people on the deck have similar responsibilities to their own safety. This is not a simple matter and is very fact specific.
Answer Applies to: Connecticut
Replied: 11/14/2011
Fairlie & Lippy, P.C. | Steven Fairlie
Whoever is responsible for maintenance would most likely be responsible. There may be more than one responsible party depending on the facts.
Answer Applies to: Pennsylvania
Replied: 11/14/2011
Bulman Law Associates PLLC Injury Law Firm | Thomas Bulman
The homeowner and the host probably share responsibility. If there was a construction defect that led to the collapse, the builder may be responsible as well. If the injuries are severe, an attorney should be retained due to the complex legal possibilities.
Answer Applies to: Montana
Replied: 11/14/2011
Law Office of David Baum | David M. Baum
A resident/owner may be liable for injuries to a third person who is injured while in the unit. In addition, the building owner and any contractor who improperly built or repaired the balcony may also be liable for any injuries or damages caused by their negligent work.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 11/14/2011
Counard & Heilmann Law Office | Michael Heilmann
The owner of the balcony is responsible for the failure to warn of the dangerous condition of the balcony. The owner may not be responsible if he or she did not know it was defective. The facts that you present make it difficult it difficult to establish a bright line if liability. The high number of people on a balcony could result in liability on the owner's behalf as he/she failed to control the number of visitors to the balcony.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 11/14/2011
Shaw Law Firm | Steven L. Shaw
Without knowing more about this particular situation, the homeowner has a good chance of being responsible. But there are a lot of facts that have not been included here that could change that response. Best option is to speak to an attorney that is familiar with premises liability claims.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 11/14/2011




















