Who is at fault if someone backed into my car while I was double parked? 22 Answers as of February 17, 2012
Someone backed up into the side of my car as they were backing out from their driveway. The other party lives on the north side of the street, while my car was double parked on the south side of the street. I was not in my vehicle. The other party backed out of their driveway, across the street and then into my car. The other party is claiming that because I was double parked, I am partially to blame. Who is at fault?Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereThe Margolis Firm | Charles J. Candiano
The driver who hit you is at fault.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 12/29/2011
Lombardi Law Firm | Steve Lombardi
Just because you were double parked doesnt give someone the right to back into your car. The car was in plain view and they are supposed to be in control of their vehicle. I would say they are at fault.
Answer Applies to: Iowa
Replied: 12/27/2011
Goodman & Goodman PA | Bruce Elliott Goodman
The car that backed into your car would be at fault. Even if being double parked could be considered negligence, and that is debatable, it was not your car being double parked that caused the accident, it was the act of the other car backing out of the driveway and hitting your car that caused the accident.
Answer Applies to: Maryland
Replied: 12/21/2011
Andrew T. Velonis, P.C. | Andrew Velonis
The other driver is at fault. The fact that you were parked where you were not supposed to be does not give the other driver an excuse to damage your property. It was the other driver who caused the accident, so it is his/her fault. He/she had the "last clear chance" to avoid the accident. Every driver has the responsibility for keeping a proper lookout and keeping control of his/her vehicle and the other driver did not do that.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 12/20/2011
Ford, Howard & Cornett, P.C. | Bradley Cornett
If your actions proximately contributed to the accident, then you may be guilty of contributory negligence under Alabama law; and contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery in Alabama. The key issue is whether or not you being doubled parked (illegal) was a contributing cause of the accident. For example, did your double parking create a situation where the other driver could not back out without precariously squeezing past your illegally parked car? On the other hand, were you simply straddling two parking spots that created no hazard whatsoever for a driver who is simply trying to avoid responsibility for his/her own negligence? The other driver doesn't get a "free shot" at your car just because you were double parked, but you can't negligently create a hazard and then blame someone else for a bad situation that you created. So the answer to your question is "depends on the circumstances."
Answer Applies to: Alabama
Replied: 12/20/2011
Carter Boyle LLC | Nelson Boyle
On these facts, I think both are at fault. My bet is that a jury would, too. Your neighbor cannot just ram your car, even if it was in the way and parked illegally. But, you cannot just park in the middle of the road.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 12/20/2011
RECHTMAN & SPEVAK | DAVID RECHTMAN
Only a judge or a jury knows for sure. But seriously, my opinion is that a fair way to look at it is that you both share the blame.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 12/20/2011
Gilbert & Bourke, LLP | Brian J. Bourke
I am not sure if it allowed to double park where you were, however, your car was not moving so the other driver should have avoided it. In California we have comparative negligence which may be the case here, that is, the negligence of each party is compared an a percentage of fault is assigned to each.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/20/2011
Broad Law Firm, LLC | Donald K. Broad
In Indiana, you might bear some of the fault. However, so long as your fault is less than 51%, then you can still recover whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the driver that backed into your car. Short of a trial, the percentage of fault would have to be negotiated. If you have collision coverage on your vehicle, I would have your own insurance company pay to repair the vehicle and let them go after the other driver.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 2/17/2012
Fisher & LaMonica, P.C. | Erron Fisher
The short answer is, even if you are stopped in the middle of the street, upside and singing, someone cannot back off of a driveway and hit you. Hitting a stopped car is not legally acceptable, even if the stopped car was parked improperly. The argument is, what if it was a small child standing where your car was, since the child is in the street is it okay to back off a driveway and strike them? As long as you were completely stopped, this should be the other drivers fault. If you were moving, you may have some degree of fault. That said, many low quality insurance companies will try to use your improper parking to reduce the amount they need to pay. Best of luck!
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 12/20/2011
The Law Offices of Paul A. Samakow, P.C. | Paul A. Samakow
The person who backed into your car is 100% at fault. The fact that you were double parked, albeit illegally, has nothing to do with his negligence in not seeing your vehicle and then striking it. He has an absolute obligation to avoid striking anything. What if your car was blocking his driveway so he couldn't even back out? He couldn't claim that he didn't see you then... so, it's no different. And in either case, he is entirely at fault. Best to you for a pleasant holiday season.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 12/20/2011
Steven Harrell, Attorney at Law | Waymon Steven Harrell
The party that backs into a fixed object is at fault. The back glass and rearview mirrors must be used by drivers before they back their vehicles up.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 12/20/2011
David F. Stoddard | David F. Stoddard
It is ultimately a question of fact for the court to resolve . Ultimately, a jury would resolve the question in a lawsuit. There is evidence of negligence on both sides. The other party is correct, your double parking could be considered negligence. It is up to a jury to decide the comparative negligence between the two of you. Also, there is a doctrine known as the Last Clear Chance Doctrine. Where an accident occurs because of a party's negligence, but the other party was in a position to avoid the accident, and had the "last clear chance" to avoid the accident, then that party may be held liable despite the other parties' negligence. As a practical matter, your two insurance companies will determine this one, and both companies will probably deny liability. In other words, your insurer will say it is the other driver's fault and the other driver's insurer will say it's your fault, and in the end, each of your own insurers will pay your damages. There is probably not enough damage to pay attorneys to take it to court, although there is an inexpensive non-binding arbitration procedure available in Circuit Court to resolve property damage disputes.
Answer Applies to: South Carolina
Replied: 12/20/2011
Bernard Huff, Attorney/Mediator | Bernard Huff
It appears that the other party who caused the collision may be more at fault than you. You should consult with an accident attorney for specific legal advice, but first contact the other driver's insurance company to see if it will assume any liability.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 12/20/2011
Wilson & Hajek, LLC | Eddie W. Wilson
There is no clear answer, but the fact that your car was in plain sight and not moving points the blame at the operator backing out of the driveway. You can file a warrant in debt in small claims court. This will allow the judge to settle any disputed claim. You can handle this property damage issue without a lawyer.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 12/20/2011
Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A. | Paul L. Whitfield
Maybe neighbor is right. In NC you have to be totally free of fault to recover. If your parking contributed to the incident then you will likely lose. If it has already reached the "he said, she said" level (blame) I suspect the insurance carrier has already decided not to pay your claim.
Answer Applies to: North Carolina
Replied: 12/20/2011
Kelaher Law Offices, P.A. | James P Kelaher
While my first response would be to say the car being moved is the one at fault, I almost backed into a car double-parked across the street from my driveway. In Florida we have comparative negligence which means that one person does not have to be 100% at fault....that sounds to me like both parties share in the blame.
Answer Applies to: Florida
Replied: 12/20/2011
Law Office of Jared Altman | Jared Altman
He is entirely at fault.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 12/20/2011
The Law Office of Harry E. Hudson, Jr. | Harry E. Hudson, Jr.
I think the other party is just looking for a way out. Your car was in place before theirs and they should have seen it and therefore had the last possibility of avoiding damage/harm. Sue in small clais court.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/20/2011
Counard & Heilmann Law Office | Michael Heilmann
Michigan is a no-fault state. When a car is LEGALLY PARKED, the person that hit is responsible. Since you were not legally parked, the other party is not legally responsible.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 12/20/2011
R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
Some collisions have circumstances where the question of fault is not easily solved. The question is whether any party was negligent (whether any party was not a careful as a reasonably prudent person similarly situated). Violation of a statute or ordinance is not negligence per se, but may be considered evidence of negligence.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 12/20/2011
Law Offices of Steven A. Fink | Steven Alan Fink
They had a duty to check when they were backing out, whether you were parked legally or illegally. Your action might reduce your damages by your percentage of fault, but they are mostly responsible.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/20/2011














