How can a spouse prevent filing bankruptcy? 19 Answers as of December 14, 2011
Can Spouse A, who has no other debt at all, quit claim their martial home to the other Spouse B, to prevent Spouse A from having to file bankruptcy. If not, how can Spouse A be prevented from having to file bankruptcy with the marital home at as A's only asset & liability?Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereIndianapolis Bankruptcy Law Office of Eric C. Lewis | Eric Lewis
You cannot move assets around in contemplation of bankruptcy - that would be fraud and both federal and state laws would prevent or reverse fradulent transfers of assets that are purposefully shielded from creditor attachment.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 12/14/2011
Theodore N. Stapleton, PC | Theodore N. Stapleton
The transfer from A to B would be a fraudulent transfer and would be avoidable by a bankruptcy trustee. You could negotiate settlements with your creditors.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 12/14/2011
West Themis Law, A Professional Law Corporation | Sally S. Chan, Esq.
Upon my reading for your question, it essentially says: Since A has debts and owns a home, if A transfers the asset to B, then A would not need to file bankruptcy since A no longer has an asset? Correct? By this very question, A has committed fraudulent transfer. An intentionally and knowingly transferred A's only asset for the sole purpose of making it difficult or impossible for A's creditors to get assets.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/14/2011
Charles R. Nettles - Attorney at Law | Charles R. Nettles
Maybe I'm not awake enough, but I don't understand why the homestead makes any difference in the situation. No one can prevent you from filing bankruptcy. In Texas, your homestead is absolutely protected from seizure which is why I can't figure out what the problem is.
Answer Applies to: Texas
Replied: 12/14/2011
The Law Office of Darren Aronow, PC | Darren Aronow
If you quit claim the property, it will be considered a "fraudulent conveyance" by the trustee. If there is less equity than the homestead exemption amount for your area, than the bankruptcy will not affect the home anyway.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 12/14/2011
Ryan Legal Services, Inc. | Kevin Ryan
The transfer of the home via Quit Claim deed to Spouse B does not in any way change the mortgage lender's security interest in the home. This means that if there is a default on the loan, then the lender can foreclose, regardless of any attempt(s) or action to transfer title. There is more than likely a provision in the mortgage documents that prohibits transfer of title to the property without the lender's written approval, usually referred to as an "anti-alienation clause."
Answer Applies to: Ohio
Replied: 12/14/2011
Law Office of Lynnmarie A. Johnson | Lynnmarie Johnson
As long as spouse A can make the house payment on their own (or if Spouse B helps) the fact that Spouse B filed bankruptcy shouldn't make Spouse A have to file. However, if they cannot make the house payment, then Spouse A is on the hook for the entire mortgage because Spouse B will have, presumably, discharged in bankruptcy. Good Luck!
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 12/14/2011
The Schreiber Law Firm | Jeffrey D. Schreiber
Any transfer within four years of filing bankruptcy without receiving payment in an amount equal to the fair market value of what was transferred can be recovered by the bankruptcy trustee or by any creditor. So transferring the house so Spouse A has no assets is not going to work unless Spouse A receives cash for the value of their interest in the house.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/13/2011
J.M. Cook, P.A. | J.M. Cook
One spouse can't prevent the other from filing bankruptcy. Quit claiming the deed would not affect the debt so Spouse A would still be liable.
Answer Applies to: North Carolina
Replied: 12/13/2011
Ashman Law Office | Glen Edward Ashman
Most of your question doesn't make sense, but any transfer between spouses to keep property out of bankruptcy could be fraudulent and land both parties in jail.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 12/13/2011
Heupel Law | Kevin Heupel
Unfortunately, your scenario does not make sense because if Spouse A does not have any debt, then spouse A does not need to file bankruptcy. Regardless, transferring assets from one spouse to another prior to a bankruptcy is NEVER a good idea. Hire an attorney who can provide you with better planning.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 12/13/2011
Dan Wilson Bankruptcy | Dan Wilson
Transferring property before filing is a transfer that can be undone by the trustee. Its also a crime.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 12/13/2011
Charles Schneider, P.C. | Charles J. Schneider
Every person has a constitutional right to file bankruptcy which cannot be prevented.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 12/13/2011
Mazyar Hedayat and Associates | Mazyar Malek Hedayat
Simply put, there is no way to get Spouse A off the hook for the mortgage in your example. Even if Spouse A (no debt except perhaps the mortgage, and on title to the house) transferred the home to Spouse B (apparently liable for multiple debts and is also on title to the marital residence), that transfer would be undone in the event of a bankruptcy. Even worse, you are proposing a *fraudulent transfer* that is impermissible under both the Illinois enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code and relevant Bankruptcy law. But there may be a way to accomplish your goals: you just need to speak with a creative and competent lawyer.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 12/13/2011
Law Office of Harry L Styron | Harry L Styron
It is not necessary for both spouses to file bankruptcy together. If one files alone it still subjects all of the community property to the bankruptcy, even though the other spouse doesn't file. The biggest issue in your case is the amount of equity you have in your home. If it is less than the exempt amount, then the home will not be subject to sale by the bankruptcy trustee. I do not have sufficient information to give you an answer. Quit claiming the house will have no effect, one way or the other, as far as the bankruptcy is concerned.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/13/2011
Judith A. Runyon, Esq. Attorney at Law | Judith A. Runyon
You can't do that. It is considered Fraud.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/13/2011
The Stockman Law Office | Mary Stockman Esq.
Sorry. Executing a quit claim deed to your husband or wife does not relieve you of liability for a mortgage. No action by 2 parties to a contract can void the rights of a third party. For example: If you divorce and the Court orders the wife to be responsible for the home mortgage, it will not stop action against the husband if the wife does not pay the debt. Once you have signed for liability on a debt, only the lender can relieve you or discharge your liability on that obligation. That is unless you file bankruptcy then for a secured claim, such as a mortgage, if you turn over possession of the home, the persons who are liable for payment of the mortgage debt have no ongoing responsibility for the mortgage payments. That only applies to pre petition payments, not post petition payments.
Answer Applies to: Florida
Replied: 12/13/2011
Carballo Law Offices | Tony E. Carballo
You cannot prevent a spouse from filing bankruptcy. You should talk to an attorney before doing serious and dangerous things like quit claiming property. It might seriously affect you and your spouse depending on the situation.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/13/2011
Janet A. Lawson Bankruptcy Attorney | Janet Lawson
You can't stop it. The transfer could be set aside by the trustee.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/13/2011













