Is there anything I can do about a personal injury that happened twenty years ago? 29 Answers as of February 20, 2012
I was injured about twenty years ago and did not settle my case. Now the injuries to my spine have gotten worse. I have arthritis, bone spurs, muscle spasms, and constant pain. Is there anything I can do?Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereBroad Law Firm, LLC | Donald K. Broad
In Indiana, the statute of limitations is 2 years for bringing a personal injury lawsuit. However if, for instance, you were under 18 when the injury occurred, the statute would not start running until you turned 18. There are other situations where the statute of limitations is tolled in Indiana. You should consult with a personal injury attorney in your area to see if you have a claim in your state.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 2/20/2012
Vincent J. Bernabei LLC | Vincent J. Bernabei
No. You waited way too long.
Answer Applies to: Oregon
Replied: 10/31/2011
Bulman Law Associates PLLC Injury Law Firm | Thomas Bulman
No. You have waited too long to file a claim. You may qualify for Social Security Disability if you are under age 63.
Answer Applies to: Montana
Replied: 10/31/2011
Fox Law Firm LLC | Tina Fox
Unfortunately the statute of limitations have passed.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 10/31/2011
Dwyer, Black & Lyle, LLP | Kevin Habberfield
Probably not . Unless you were an infant (under 18) or under some other disability that would toll the statute, the Statute of limitations is typically 3 years for a negligence case. There is something called the discovery doctrine but, it's application is limited. In short you are probably time barred. It may be worthwhile to see an attorney to analyze your situation but, most likely, it's a dead end.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 10/31/2011
Joel H. Schwartz, P.C. | Steven A. Schwartz
The statute of limitations, or the time frame in which you are allowed to sue, is surely gone at this point.
Answer Applies to: Massachusetts
Replied: 10/31/2011
Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A. | Paul L. Whitfield
If you were of full age when the collision occurred it is too late. The statute of limitations is 3 years. If you were under age the statute begins to run when you reach full age.
Answer Applies to: North Carolina
Replied: 10/31/2011
The Margolis Firm | Charles J. Candiano
Sorry. The Statute of Limitations is 2 years. You gave up all rights to the claim 18 years ago.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 10/31/2011
Attorney & Counselor at Law | John Hugger
Probably not, unless the person who injured you was beyond service of process - which usually means out of the country, but consult with an attorney.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 10/31/2011
David F. Stoddard | David F. Stoddard
It is too late to file a lawsuit.
Answer Applies to: South Carolina
Replied: 10/31/2011
Bernard Huff, Attorney/Mediator | Bernard Huff
It appears that you may be time-barred from initiating a personal injury claim or litigation for your medical problems. However, with your statedmedical problems, you may qualify for disability benefits. Perhaps, you should consult with an attorney who handles medical disability claims.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 10/31/2011
Kelaher Law Offices, P.A. | James P Kelaher
No, the statute of limitations has run.
Answer Applies to: Florida
Replied: 10/31/2011
Miller & Harrison, LLC | David Harrison
You are probably out of luck but it is worth sitting down with a personal injury lawyer to discuss the specifics of your case and find out if there is anything that can be done, but there likely isn't.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 10/31/2011
Lombardi Law Firm | Steve Lombardi
Probably not. It's been way too long past the statute of limitations and the discovery rule more than likely isn't going to help you in that this could be anticipated, but probably not proven twenty years ago. Additionally you have the issue of causation that will likely be tough to prove up after twenty years of aging and more than likely having other accidents and injuries.
Answer Applies to: Iowa
Replied: 10/31/2011
Alfred Law Firm | Janice Alfred
You have 2 years from the date of the incident to file a personal injury claim, so I am afraid your statute of limitations has long expired.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 10/31/2011
Paris Blank LLP | Irving M Blank
Probably not. Your statue of limitations has probably expired.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 10/31/2011
Beaver Holt Sternlicht and Courie, P.A. | Mark A. Sternlicht
Unless there is some special reason why the three-year statute of limitations did not run, the time for you to file suit has passed.
Answer Applies to: North Carolina
Replied: 10/31/2011
Law Offices of Andrew D. Myers | Andrew D. Myers
No. The statute of limitations in New Hampshire is 3 years on such cases. Statutes of limitation are backed up by the policy requiring finality in legal affairs. There's nothing you can do now.
Answer Applies to: New Hampshire
Replied: 10/31/2011
Klisz Law Office, PLLC | Timothy J. Klisz
No. Statute of limitations is 3 years on injury cases.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 10/31/2011
Andrew T. Velonis, P.C. | Andrew Velonis
The statute of limitations is three years. Have you applied for SSD?
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 10/31/2011
Adler Law Group, LLC | Lawrence Adler
If you did not bring the law suit already, it is to late now.
Answer Applies to: Connecticut
Replied: 10/28/2011
R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
Normally, the statute of limitations requires commencement of a lawsuit within 3 years, if at all. RCW 4.16.080 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=4.16.080).
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 10/28/2011
McKell Christiansen | Michael McKell
Unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done. If you condition limits your ability to work you could apply for social security disability benefits but as far as an injury claim. Nothing can be done at this point. Sorry.
Answer Applies to: Utah
Replied: 10/28/2011
Law Office of Russell D. Gray, PC | Russell D. Gray
In Utah, the statute of limitations for a personal injury is 4 years. You will not be able to bring a claim for a personal injury that happened 20 years ago, because the statute of limitations has expired.
Answer Applies to: Utah
Replied: 10/28/2011
Hostetter & O'Hara | Matthew E. Dumas
No. The statute of limitations is 2 years from the date of loss.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 10/28/2011
Law Offices of Bodey & Bodey, PLLC | Michael Bodey
I would require additional information on your situation. However, assuming it was a motor vehicle accident that injured your spine, then in 1989, the Washington State Supreme Court held that a 6 year contract-based statute of limitation applies to UIM claims, rather than a 3 year tort based statute of limitations. Thus, a three-year statute of limitation applies to claims filed to recover damages for personal injuries received in a motor vehicle accident. This may be found under RCW 4.16.080 (2). However, this may not be your situation. The six-year statute of limitations may apply if the person who hit you did not have insurance or is simply underinsured, and you have a policy which contains underinsured motorist protection. This would allow for a six-year statute of limitations. However, an insured must not confuse his or her UIM entitlement with any right that the insured may also have against their own insurance Co. as a third-party claimant. So let us say, for example, if an insured driver is injured while riding as a passenger in his or her own vehicle, and the collision was the fault of an uninsured or underinsured driver of the insured's vehicle, the three-year tort statute of limitations found under RCW 4.16.080 (2) will apply to the insured's third-party claim against his or her insurer. This is so because the person's status as a named insured does not change the applicable statute of limitations when that person files a third-party claim against his or her own insurer. In addition, one must bear in mind that, if you find yourself in a UIM situation, a close review of your policy may reveal that you are unable to file a lawsuit. Rather, there may be other hoops set up by your insurance company that you must jump through, prior to the filing in court. What you need to remember is if these hoops have not been jumped through by you, as you promised you would do when you purchased policy, then the insurance company can force you to do so and courts are helpless in this matter. Bottom line, a close review of your policy, is warranted in all cases. Washington State's legal system has time limits on which one may make a claim. There are many reasons for these temporal elements. For example, over time, evidence may be corrupted, disappear, witnesses memories fade, scenes for which collisions occurred change, and entities dispose of critical records. The best time to bring a lawsuit is while the aforementioned is not lost or corrupted and as close as possible to the alleged negligent behavior. Thus, it has been my experience as an ex-claims insurance adjuster working with defense counsel on litigation files, and now as a plaintiff's attorney; that insurance companies like to drag out the litigation process in order to advance their profit margins and causes because they know that overtime evidence may be corrupted, disappear, memories fade, scenes for which collisions occurred change and entities dispose of critical records which would allow the plaintiff to prove their case. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the injured party to swiftly bring about changes so that the process may begin and fully executed. Generally speaking, these limitations, or for the lack of a better term, time periods begin when a cause of action is deemed to have arisen, and in some situations when a plaintiff had reason to know of the harm or should have known of the harm rather than at the time of the original event. This distinction is important in cases in which an event which occurred earlier on has delayed ramifications.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 10/28/2011
Ruiz Law Group, P.C. | Frances Ruiz
The statute of limitations has run on your claims. You may want to consider applying for social security disability.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 10/28/2011
The Carlile Law Firm, LLP | D. Scott Carlile
Not if your accident happened in Texas. The time limit to bring a suit in Texas is 2 years from the date of the accident.
Answer Applies to: Texas
Replied: 10/28/2011
Mishkind Law Firm, Co., L.P.A. | Howard Mishkind
In Ohio there is a defined period of time within which you must file a lawsuit to recover for injuries and damages caused due to negligence. If you were a minor under the age of 18 at the time of the accident you had until you turned 20 years old unless the incident involved medical care in which event you had until you turned 19. Not knowing how old you were at the time of your accident, I assume from your description that the incident that occurred 20 years ago would place your claim beyond any statute of limitations unless you were and remain legally incompetent in which even the statute of limitations may be tolled. Sorry but it sounds like you are likely too late to do anything from a legal perspective.
Answer Applies to: Ohio
Replied: 10/28/2011



























