How different should a product need to be to be marketable without infringing on a patent? 5 Answers as of June 29, 2015

I had an idea for a product I could market, not majorly, but in my spare time. I do not want to give the details, but I will give you an example. I know someone who makes do it yourself photobooths and sells them on It is a kit that helps you make it yourself so you do not have to pay the ridiculous prices to rent a photobooth. My question is is it patent infringement to market this kind of photobooth if the person who invented photobooths has a patent for them? Assume for the sake of the analogy the the person with the patent is the only one who sells them. How different from the patented product does my product need to be for me to market it without infringing on the copyright.

Ask a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.

Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click here
Webb IP Law Group
Webb IP Law Group | Jason P Webb
There is not a simple answer to this question. Answering that question requires that an attorney review the patent(s) in question, including their file histories and then discuss their scope with you while exploring how you might do it differently to not infringe. Plan on spending at least between about $500 - $1500+ on this process.
Answer Applies to: Utah
Replied: 6/28/2015
Gerald R. Black, Esq.
Gerald R. Black, Esq. | Gerald R. Black
This is an excellent question. The first step is to determine whether or not the person marketing the "do it yourself photobooths" is operating under a patent. The patent could be assigned to the company or licensed to the company. Or, there could be a pending patent application. The person may have the product marked with one or more patent numbers or simply "patent pending". Once a patent has been identified, an attorney needs to review the claims of the patent to determine the scope of the patent. It may be relatively easy to design around the patent. This all is highly technical and it is strongly advised that you seek the assistance of counsel. If there is no issued patent or "patent pending", the technology may be in the public domain and available to anyone. Good Luck!!
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 6/29/2015
Sebby Law Office
Sebby Law Office | Jayne Sebby
First you will need to determine if any part of the other product has been and still is patented. Using your example, there probably aren't very many, if any, elements of a photo booth that are under patent protection. However, the inventor may have gotten a "design" patent because of some unique way the photo booth is structured or appears. If that's the case, you will have to come up with a different design to avoid infringement. If there is a utility patent, you will have to avoid the parts of the photo booth that are covered by it when you develop yours.
Answer Applies to: Nebraska
Replied: 6/25/2015
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. | Ernie Linek
To avoid infringement charges - the product should be different enough that a jury won't believe that the patent covers it. Patents have "claims" that define the scope and coverage of the invention. These come at the end of the patent - and get interpreted by a judge in Federal Court as to what they mean and what they cover. Broad claims capture numerous differences between the claimed invention and the accused product. Narrow claims capture only products that are closely or exactly as defined by the claims of the patent. There are two types of patent infringement - (1) literal infringement and (2) infringement under the doctrine of equivalents (DOE). If a patent claim defines your product exactly - literal infringement will likely be found by the court. If the patent claim does not literally define your product - but instead, your product does the same thing, in the same was, and achieves the same result as the claimed invention - DOE infringement will likely be found. There are specific rules regarding the analysis of claims and products - if you leave out a necessary claim element from your invention, and do not replace it with an equivalent element - you may not infringe the claim under the "all elements rule." To be safe - see a patent attorney to compare your product to the patent. This is a called freedom to operate analysis.
Answer Applies to: Massachusetts
Replied: 6/25/2015
Law Office of Kirk Buhler
Law Office of Kirk Buhler | Kirk A Buhler
A patent is only good for a maximum of 14 or 20 years. Photobooths have been around for possibly 100 years or more. Early patents have expired. Generally for a design patent the change must be sufficient that a person looking at your product would not think that it is the same product as the shown in the valid issued patent. It is called "confusion in the marketplace". For a utility patent the invention is described in words and you must compare the features of your product with the claims of the issued valid patent. A copyright is for an "artistic expression" it is not a patent. A copyright is usually for a picture, movie, song or book etc. Copyrights are good for the life of the author plus up to 99 or more years in some countries. Most often infringement is perceived by the owner of the patent, trademark or copyright.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 6/25/2015
Click to View More Answers: