Do I have a possible defense based on the theory that the alcohol hadn't had time to enter my blood system? 15 Answers as of April 19, 2013

I stopped at an establishment, had 2 drinks and ate. I was there for approximately 15 minutes. I left immediately after quickly drinking my 2nd drink. I was pulled over 2 minutes after I left.

Ask a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.

Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click here
Law Offices of Laurie A. Schmidt, P.C. | Laurie Schmidt
Your question cannot accurately be answered without a detail review of ALL facts and the entire police file from the incident. If you have a defense to the charges (which you may); the only way to assert that defense is to take the case to trial. Simply telling the prosecutor or DA that you have a defense and then explaining your defense does nothing more then tip your hand. The DA or prosecutor would not dismiss the charges based on the assertion of the defense. Even with that, you still must fight the DMV action which is separate from the court action.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 4/19/2013
Gregory Casale Attorney at Law
Gregory Casale Attorney at Law | Gregory Casale
Yes you do. The alcohol takes a while to dissipate through your system. Retrograde extrapolation is the process by which you estimate the effects of something later with a current measurement. I often argue this in DUI/OUI cases. The government must prove your impairment at the time of operation. It doesn't matter what you blew at the police station. I must warn you though, it will likely take an expert to use this defense as a lay person is unqualified to explain it.
Answer Applies to: Massachusetts
Replied: 4/19/2013
Musilli Brennan Associates PLLC
Musilli Brennan Associates PLLC | John F Brennan
There are such defenses, sometimes successful, get an attorney to assist you.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 4/18/2013
Lawrence Lewis
Lawrence Lewis | Lawrence Lewis, PC
You can try and argue that. Do you have an attorney that is going to argue that?
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 4/18/2013
Timothy J. Thill P.C.
Timothy J. Thill P.C. | Timothy J. Thill
If you can find a witness to back up your story, and provide expert testimony about how long it takes for the alcohol to affect your ability to operate a car, you might win this case at a trial. You do not indicate whether you took a breath test or not. The results of that test, along with the time it was administered, might also work in your favor, or it may not. Hire a defense attorney to represent you in this case, and good luck!
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 4/18/2013
    MatthewR. Schutz, Esq | Matthew R. Schutz
    Not in New Jersey. The NJ Supreme Court has held if you blow a 0.08 BAC, it creates a presumption you are driving under the influence and unless you can show that the testing equipment was defective, you are in deep trouble.
    Answer Applies to: New Jersey
    Replied: 4/18/2013
    S. Joseph Schramm | Joseph Schramm
    You can't raise a defense under Pennsylvania's DUI law that the alcohol had not entered your blood stream unless a blood test shows that you were not over the limit. In that case the tests would show chemical proof that the alcohol had not been absorbed. Pennysylvania's DUI law is what the state supreme court has referred to as a strict liability statute. Basically, if your breathalyzer test blood test registers an alcohol reading above the legal limit you are conclusively proven to be driving while under the influence. The only defence you can raise is that the lab tests or breathalyzer test were incorrectly performed and the evidence was damaged thereby.
    Answer Applies to: Pennsylvania
    Replied: 4/18/2013
    Freeborn Law Offices, P.S.
    Freeborn Law Offices, P.S. | Steve Freeborn
    Probably not.
    Answer Applies to: Washington
    Replied: 4/18/2013
    Law Office of Andrew Roberts
    Law Office of Andrew Roberts | Andrew Stephen Roberts
    Yes. Get an attorney .
    Answer Applies to: California
    Replied: 4/18/2013
    Law Office of Michael E. Dailey
    Law Office of Michael E. Dailey | Michael E. Dailey
    Actually you may have such a defense but it can take an expert witness to verify it as well a fact witnesses to prove the time line. Your word alone may not be enough.
    Answer Applies to: Missouri
    Replied: 4/18/2013
    Charles M. Schiff, Attorney at Law
    Charles M. Schiff, Attorney at Law | Charles M. Schiff
    In Minnesota, a test result at any time within two hours of the driving conduct is deemed to be the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving. This was built into the DWI statute specifically to eliminate the argument that the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving was less than the apparent result of the test.
    Answer Applies to: Minnesota
    Replied: 4/18/2013
Click to View More Answers:
12 3 Free Legal QuestionsConnect with a local attorney

Need more information on drunk driving law? Visit our free DUI resource page to learn more.

If you need immediate assistance, fill out a free case evaluation form to connect with a DUI lawyer in your area today!