Can I be sued for the credit card account? 19 Answers as of January 27, 2012
I had a credit card in my dad's name but with me as a user. I was paying the payments until I lost my job. Years later my dad was dying and married a woman that is now trying to sue me for fraud for the balance. Can she or the company do that if my dad is not alive to speak?Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereLaw Office of Sam Levine, LLC | Sam L. Levine
If the account is/was in your father's name & you were merely a user, then you are not legally responsible for the debt absent some executory agreement related to your father's will, etc.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 1/27/2012
Law Offices of Richard Copeland, LLC | Richard Copeland
Whether you can be made liable for this credit card account depends largely on how it was being used and how it was set up. The credit card holder can allow others to use their card without being liable on the account. However, if you were actually on the account then you could be liable to the credit card company for the balance of payments. As far as the surviving spouse, she is now being asked to make the payments undoubtedly it if you had been using the credit card as your own personal credit card, she may have a case against you.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 1/27/2012
DEAN T. JENNINGS, P.C. | Dean T Jennings
If you used his card with his permission, but were not an authorized signer on the card, you have a problem. Was your father's estate opened and the credit card company given notice to file a claim? If it was and they did not do so after proper notice the debt is no longer collectable. However, you better seek more specific legal advice as you cannot use someone else's credit card, There are lots of problems both civil and criminal with what you have been doing.
Answer Applies to: Iowa
Replied: 1/27/2012
Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A. | Paul L. Whitfield
Your statement of facts not clear. If you were authorized to use the card there is no fraud. But if you used it you are liable to pay the bill.
Answer Applies to: North Carolina
Replied: 1/27/2012
Law Office of Mark J. Leonardo | Mark Leonardo
Can she? Of course. Can she win? It will be up to you to prove the arrangement you and your father had. If you can show you were charging and making the payments and were an authorized user, you should be able to avoid the fraud charge. Whether you can be held responsible to pay is a different question. If your father had a probate, the credit card account would have gone through that process.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 1/27/2012
Ford, Howard & Cornett, P.C. | Bradley Cornett
Your exact question is whether or not you can be sued. Of course, you can be sued. Lawsuits are filed every day, but defendants win many of those lawsuits. So the real question is whether or not you are liable (legally responsible). If you used the credit card with your dad's consent and he was competent to give consent, then you did not defraud him. Note: If you kept charging on the credit card after your father became elderly and incompetent, some state's may consider that a form of undue influence or elder abuse. Whether or not you are liable to the credit card company for the account balance depends on what you signed, and may be impacted by the common law of your state. If you received the benefit of the credit card (i.e., ate the meals charged on the credit card, have the television bought with the credit card, etc.), then you might be liable to the credit card company for quantum meruit (an implied contract theory meaning "as much as deserved").
Answer Applies to: Alabama
Replied: 1/27/2012
Bulman Law Associates PLLC Injury Law Firm | Thomas Bulman
Yes. If you are sued, don't ignore it. Send a letter to the court denying that you owe all that is claimed and demand an accounting of all charges. That will delay things a bit. You are responsible unless you can show your father gave you permission to charge. Like a letter from him or proof that he made payments on the account as you were charging, implying agreement with your ongoing use. If the charges are after his death, of course you are responsible. If you were less than 18 years old for any of the charges, you can claim your father was supporting you. The honorable course is to pay the charges you made. Your papa's reputation is at stake, at least symbolically. The spirit of your father may be watching. Some believe that death is not an ending but a beginning. See you on the other side.
Answer Applies to: Montana
Replied: 1/27/2012
The Margolis Firm | Charles J. Candiano
If your father were alive, the creditor could recover from him. After your father's death, the creditor would file a lien against his estate which must be paid. You acknowledge that you made the purchases and that they were NOT for the benefit of your father. It seems reasonable that his estate should seek to recover whatever amount you charged and any interest or penalty/ attorney fees which may have accrued as a result of your delinquency.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 1/27/2012
Steven Harrell, Attorney at Law | Waymon Steven Harrell
The statute of limitations in Georgia on claims involving credit cards is six years. Any claim brought against you to recover debt charged on a credit card must be brought within six years of the date you last used the card to make purchases.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 1/27/2012
Andrew T. Velonis, P.C. | Andrew Velonis
It isn't fraud because your dad put you on the account as a user. He gave you his permission to use the card, so you only did what he permitted you to do. Fraud is where you deceive someone by making a false representation. Of course, someone could try to say that you tricked him into it or forged his name, but that gets into some detailed evidenciary issues.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 1/27/2012
Albert Law Group | Alvin S. Albert
As an authorized user you had the right to use the card. She may want you to pay the bill but that doesn't mean you commited fraud- which is an illegal act.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 1/27/2012
Law Office of Jared Altman | Jared Altman
I hope you didn't charge anything after he died. Otherwise, I think you're okay.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 1/27/2012
Lombardi Law Firm | Steve Lombardi
I'm not sure if she can or can't because you mentioned fraud. If you committed fraud then she may be able to, but from what you describe it sounds doubtful.
Answer Applies to: Iowa
Replied: 1/27/2012
Attorney at Law | Ernest Krause
I don't think your dad would have anything relevant to say if you signed an agreement with the card issuer to be liable for the amount that now remains unpaid. If the credit card issuer goes after you tell them to produce all evidence that you are liable. You could offer to settle for a fraction of the amount. "Bill collectors" usually buy the accounts for maybe five cents on the dollar, so they can make money even with a small settlement. Seems like you did no "fraud." If there is a law school anywhere near you it may have a clinic with law students who can help you for free. You can call NOLO Press in Berkeley to see if they have a book that would help you. Do creative google searches.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 1/27/2012
David F. Stoddard | David F. Stoddard
I would have to read the contract to advise you on your liability to the company. However, if the widow is suing you for fraud, my guess is that you are not liable to the company. Rather, your Dad signed up for the card solely in his name and you were just an authorized user, making his estate solely liable for the debt. I assume the widow is suing you for fraud because this debt is cutting into what she will get. I assume that she is alleging that you fraudulently opened the card in your father's name without his permission or knowledge. She would have the burden of proving this, and such a case would involve an obscure law known as the dead man's statute that limits evidence of business transactions involving a person who is dead and cannot testify about the transaction. The rule prohibiting hearsay evidence would also limit the widow's ability to testify about any conversations she allegedly had with your father about the card. It is possible that you and your father are liable for the debt on the card, and she is suing you for fraud because even if you are jointly liable, the company can go against the estate for the whole amount unless you fraudulently opened the card, in which case, the estate would be off the hook.
Answer Applies to: South Carolina
Replied: 1/27/2012
Adler Law Group, LLC | Lawrence Adler
Nice step mom. There would be no fraud. Your dad agreed to be responsible for the payments. If you used the money, your dads estate, not his wife can sue for reimbursement. It is very possible the statute of limitations may have expired.
Answer Applies to: Connecticut
Replied: 1/27/2012
Law Offices of H. Christopher Coburn | H. Christopher Coburn
When you say "years later" it sounds like any claim may be barred by the statute of limitations. She may be claiming fraud for 2 reasons, (1) to get around a statute of limitations problem - the SOL for fraud starts running from the date of discovery so she may be claiming that fraud was recently discovered, and (2) a judgment for fraud would likely not be discharged in a bankruptcy. It sounds like you have good defenses, but you should consult with an attorney.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 1/27/2012
R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
If you received goods or services with a credit card, you may be responsible for the payments unless you go into bankruptcy.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 1/27/2012
Paris Blank LLP | Irving M Blank
Anyone can sue you. If you used the card you owe the credit card company. Your stepmother has a much weaker case and I would need more facts before answering you.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 1/27/2012


















