Can we be responsible for the medical bill if my daughter accidentally injured another girl? 21 Answers as of October 28, 2011
My daughter, who is five, was pushing an empty swing in a park when another girl walked in front of it and it struck her in the head. It caused a cut and required glue to close the cut. The parents are threatening to sue to get the medical bill paid. She did not do this intentionally, it was an accident. Her father says the bill was $1,400 dollars. Can we be legally responsible for the bill?Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer!
Enter Zipcode or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Have a general legal question? Click hereAsk a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.
Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281
Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click hereChalat Hatten & Koupal PC | Linda Chalat
The father of the injured child may file a lawsuit against you, probably in small claims court. But he may be bluffing, so wait until you are actually served a summons and complaint. You have no obligation to pay the medical bills until a judgment is entered against you following a trial, and it is doubtful that such an outcome would occur. Children age five are typically held to a standard of care reasonable for a five-year-old. What you describe does not strike one as unreasonable behavior for a toddler. An unfortunate accident, but a judge would probably find it was an accident all the same.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 10/17/2011
Law Office of Jared Altman | Jared Altman
If your daughter was negligent in that she did not act as a prudent five year old would act (I'm not kidding), then she could liable. Not you. But sounds like it was the other girl's fault. Don't pay.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 10/12/2011
Law Office of Dean B. Gordon | Dean B. Gordon
California Civil Code Section 1714.1(a) imposes liability of a parent or guardian for the willful misconduct of a minor causing injury or death to another up to $25,000. A child under 5 is presumed not to be responsible for her conduct, i.e., she is incapable of negligence. However, a parent or guardian who should have been watching the five year-old could be liable for failing to properly supervise or control her.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 10/12/2011
Coulter's Law | Coulter K. Richardson
In theory yes, but most likely no. Every person who enters a playground shoulders an "assumption of risk". Playgrounds, especially public ones are inherently dangerous places. Children push and pull things. There is nothing unusual about a child pushing an empty swing. As a parent, I have seen countless near misses and actual collisions with swings even when there is a person in the swing and thus ostensibly easier to see the moving target and avoid it. Children will fixate on things in the distance and be completely oblivious to anything and everything in between. That is where the child's parents come in. They too have a duty to be mindful of the obstacles their child is unaware of. Finally, whether you have a duty to be wary of other children's safety, a key element of breaching that "duty" would be whether or not you were aware of a potential breach of that duty. Thus if you were aware of a child that was wandering in the vicinity of the swing and made no attempt to stop your child or warn the other child, then perhaps you might have breached your duty. However, as I said, because a child pushing a swing (empty or full) is not an activity that is out of the ordinary in a playground setting, and thus you were not aware of a danger, and you were also not aware of the other child's presence nearby, and even if you were, the ability for you to warn the child and for that child to hear and react appropriately to that warning was extremely limited, I would say you are not liable. I know things seem to happen in slow motion when a child is about to get hurt, but in real time, the time that anyone would have had to prevent such and injury was probably less than 2 or 3 seconds.
Answer Applies to: New Jersey
Replied: 10/12/2011
Law Offices of Tom Patton | Thomas C. Patton
In order to be liable, your daughter would have to be at fault, either by acting purposefully, or by being negligent. It sounds like the child who was injured, however, is as much at fault as anyone for her injuries for negligently walking in front of a swing.
Answer Applies to: Oregon
Replied: 10/12/2011
The Law Office of Josh Lamborn, P.C. | Josh Lamborn
I would probably go ahead and let those parents sue. Who is to say that the other child was not responsible for walking in front of the swing? Also, the parents would have to sue your five year old for negligently hurting their child and/or sue you for negligent supervision of your child. Accidents happen. Tell that father he should carry health insurance for his child.
Answer Applies to: Oregon
Replied: 10/12/2011
Law Offices of Minh C. Wai, P.C. | Minh C. Wai
Some states have laws that make parents responsible for their children's mischief. Mischief may not always be intentional. The statutes may cover accidents as well. You should check to determine if you live in a state that has such a law.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 10/12/2011
Bulman Law Associates PLLC Injury Law Firm | Thomas Bulman
Probably not, but if you are sued, contact you home insurance to see if they will defend you. If not, answer the lawsuit and deny any claims you don't agree with. Do it in writing sent to the clerk of the court the suit is filed in. Never ever ignore legal papers. If you do, the other side wins by default. Fighting the charges later is rarely successful and always costly.
Answer Applies to: Montana
Replied: 10/12/2011
Bernard Huff, Attorney/Mediator | Bernard Huff
Consult with an accident attorney for legal advice and direction regarding the direct cause of the swing accident and who is liabile for the injury. Initially,it may be wise to attermpt to find out if the park and/or the parents of the injured girl carried insurance to cover the injury at the time of the accident.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 10/12/2011
Dunnings Law Firm | Steven Dunnings
You can be sued for anything, that does not mean there will be a recovery.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 10/28/2011
Wilson & Hajek, LLC | Eddie W. Wilson
A child of five is not considered of age to be found negligent under the laws of Virginia. While not legally responsible there may be a moral obligation to share in the bill, that you may want to consider.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 10/12/2011
Kelaher Law Offices, P.A. | James P Kelaher
Yes, but that is why you have homeowner's insurance. Turn the claim in to your homeowner's insurer and they should take care of it for you.
Answer Applies to: Florida
Replied: 10/12/2011
R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
The main person legally responsible for the injuries to another is the person (if any) who acted negligently. If the negligent party was a minor, the minor owes the injured party for the damages. Of course, many minors are judgment-proof due to insufficient assets and minors can sometimes avoid debts by declaring bankruptcy, too. RCW 4.24.190 establishes an action against parents for willful injury to person or property by a minor by saying the following:"The parent or parents of any minor child under the age of eighteen years who is living with the parent or parents and who shall willfully or maliciously destroy or deface property, real or personal or mixed, or who shall willfully and maliciously inflict personal injury on another person, shall be liable to the owner of such property or to the person injured in a civil action at law for damages in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars. This section shall in no way limit the amount of recovery against the parent or parents for their own common law negligence.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 10/12/2011
Craig Kelley & Faultless | David W. Craig
Under Indiana law your daughter can not be legally responsible for her acts because of her age. However a parent could be responsible for not properly supervising a child. You should check with your homeowners policy to see if it would cover you if as the parent you were held liable for negligent supervision.
Answer Applies to: Indiana
Replied: 10/12/2011
Law Offices of Richard Copeland, LLC | Richard Copeland
Parents are generally not responsible for the negligent acts of their children. More importantly, a five year old is not capable of negligence under our law. It's a truly unfortunate accident, but you are not responsible for the medical bills.
Answer Applies to: Colorado
Replied: 10/12/2011
Lacy Fields, Attorney at Law, LLC | Lacy Fields
if this were to go to court, a jury would ultimately decide who was at fault. They might decide the fault was 50/50. They might decide the other girl was 100% at fault. They might decide your daughter was 100% at fault. However, it is such a small amount that the other family will likely have to sue you in small claims court. No attorney would represent the other family and become involved in a disputed case when there would be so little money to pay the lawyer - unless of course it was a friend of the family. You could always ask them to send you a copy of the bill and offer to pay half of whatever they came out of pocket. My guess is that insurance paid for almost everything.
Answer Applies to: Missouri
Replied: 10/12/2011
Klisz Law Office, PLLC | Timothy J. Klisz
Yes, and your homeowners insurance will cover it. Turn in the claim.
Answer Applies to: Michigan
Replied: 10/28/2011
The Law Office of Harry E. Hudson, Jr. | Harry E. Hudson, Jr.
Sounds as if the injured child placed herself in jeopardy by walking in front of the swing and the injured child's parents may also be at fault for not properly supervising their child.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 10/12/2011
Law Office of Ronald Arthur Lowry | Ronald Arthur Lowry
No, not in my opinion under the facts you recited.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 10/12/2011
Magnuson Lowell P.S. | Richard S. Lowell
A 5 year old cannot be liable for negligence. You are not liable for your child's negligence unless it can be proven that you failed to properly supervise your child, and that you knew or should have known that your child's actions were potentially dangerous to others. This seems rather unlikely. As a result, you are probably not liable for the bill. In the event you do get sued, you should immediately contact your homeowner's or renters insurance company who would handle the matter on your behalf.
Answer Applies to: Washington
Replied: 10/12/2011
Theodore W. Robinson, P.C. | Theodore W. Robinson
I don't believe so, but its always best to talk to a local attorney just to make sure to get all the details right and give you direct advice. Good luck.
Answer Applies to: New York
Replied: 10/12/2011





















