Can I sue the policy holder for injuries or just the driver? 36 Answers as of February 17, 2012

I was in an accident and the other driver was at fault. He is a high school senior. The insurance policy is in a different name but same address. If the limits are low, can I sue the policy holder or just the driver? I was injured and have had two surgeries. The doctor says I will likely need more.

Ask a Local Attorney. 100% Anonymous. Free Answers.

Or for Immediate Assistance call (888) 428-7281

Free Case Evaluation by a Local Lawyer: Click here
Law Office of Sam Levine, LLC
Law Office of Sam Levine, LLC | Sam L. Levine
Dear Injured, The claim is against the driver. I would recommend that you consult with an attorney about your car accident case. There is a great deal of additional information that is needed to properly advise you.
Answer Applies to: Georgia
Replied: 12/12/2011
Tucker Griffin Barnes, PC | Yvonne T. Griffin
Unless the policy holder was somehow at fault, e.g. he allowed the driver to drive his car knowing the driver was drunk, the policy holder cannot be held responsible for the actions of another. Your suit is only against those who were at fault.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 12/8/2011
Michael J. Sgarlat Attorney at Law | Michael Joseph Sgarlat
IN VIRGINIA you can only sue the driver who caused the accident unless you can prove that the owner was negligent in allowing the operator to use his vehicle. For example the owner was aware that the operator was intoxicated when he borrowed the vehicle.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 12/8/2011
Gregory Casale Attorney at Law
Gregory Casale Attorney at Law | Gregory Casale
That may be an option. More facts would be necessary to know for sure. You certainly should have an attorney for that type of case and your attorney should be able to answer that question.
Answer Applies to: Massachusetts
Replied: 12/7/2011
Law Office of David Baum
Law Office of David Baum | David M. Baum
You should speak to your attorney, but you are right to inquire whether there are any other parties or insurance policies to make a claim against. For example, you should make a claims against not only the driver, but also the registered owner of the vehicle, if different from the driver, and possibly also the owner's homeowner's policy.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/7/2011
Gilbert & Bourke, LLP | Brian J. Bourke
You can sue the driver and the registered owner. If the driver was a minor, the parents may have some liability depending on the circumstances. You should consult an attorney as soon as possible so they can determine which parties and which insurance policies might apply to pay for your claim.
Answer Applies to: California
Replied: 12/7/2011
Law Office of Joshua Pond | Joshua Pond
Whether or not you can sue the policy holder, rather than the driver, will depend on additional details. For example, was the person driving on behalf of the policy holder? Was the driver under 18? There are several other details to consider as well. There is no reason why you should remain a victim here and you simply must be justly compensated for what happened to you.
Answer Applies to: Oregon
Replied: 12/7/2011
The Law Offices of Paul A. Samakow, P.C.
The Law Offices of Paul A. Samakow, P.C. | Paul A. Samakow
You sue the driver. The policyholder did not cause your injuries. If the limit is "low", look at your own auto insurance policy. If you have higher Under-Insured limits (might be called UM or UIM), you are entitled to make a claim for the difference between the limit of the at fault party and your UIM limit. An example might be that the at fault driver has a $25,000.00 liability limit. Your UIM limit is $100,000.00. In this example, you could conceivably obtain an additional $75,000.00 from your company. Do not concern yourself with using your own policy. That is what it is there for... people often hesitate or don't make this type of claim for fear that their premiums would go up... this is not possible, and even if it were, would you rather have a small increase in your premium and get an additional $75,000.00, or have no increase in premium and get nothing? best to you. feel free to call me if you have questions.
Answer Applies to: Virginia
Replied: 12/7/2011
Cary J. Wintroub & Associates
Cary J. Wintroub & Associates | Sheldon J. Aberman
No, you may not sue the policyholder. You may sue the driver for negligence. Also, you may sue the principal of the driver, if the driver was an agent for some individual and/or entity and if the driver was engaged in the course and scope of that agency at the time of the accident. Notwithstanding, even if you could sue the policyholder, the same policy that covered the driver would apply to the policyholder and the result would be that adding the policyholder would afford you no additional coverage.
Answer Applies to: Illinois
Replied: 12/7/2011
Goodman & Goodman PA | Bruce Elliott Goodman
You could possibly have a cause of action against the owner of the vehicle if the driver was either an employee or an agent of the owner. For example, if the driver was working for the owner and on a job related errand, or if the owner was a parent of the driver and had asked the driver to go to the store to pick up a prescription for the owner. There could also be a cause of action against the owner if the owner provided the vehicle to the driver but knew or had reason to know that the driver's use of the vehicle presented an unreasonable risk of harm to others due to reasons such as the employee's youth, inexperience, or other such reasons.
Answer Applies to: Maryland
Replied: 12/7/2011
    Andrews & Sanders Law Office
    Andrews & Sanders Law Office | Richard A Sanders Jr
    In Georgia,generally, the insurancestays with the vehicle. So if the driver had permission to drive the car then the insurance should provide coverage. However, it may depend on the language in the policy. Based on the facts you gave, it appears the driver was thenamed insured's child. In this case,the driver should be covered, but there are always exceptions. Also, look at the policy; there is a chance that the driver is listed as a driver. It is possible tosue the named insured. You might be able to make a case that it was negligent for the named insured to let the driver drive.
    Answer Applies to: Georgia
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    The Margolis Firm
    The Margolis Firm | Charles J. Candiano
    Legally, you can seek recovery from both the driver and the owner but the policies cannot be "stacked" or added together. You will be obligated to re-pay your group health insurance carrier or whatever entity paid for your medical care. An attorney can significantly reduce the amount you repay. You may also merit an under insurance claim against your own policy. Given the extent of your injuries and the complexity of dealing with three insurance companies, it would be foolish to handle this without an attorney.
    Answer Applies to: Illinois
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    The Law Office of Stephen R. Chesley, LLC
    The Law Office of Stephen R. Chesley, LLC | Stephen R. Chesley
    You have a case against both the owner and driver of a motor vehicle. The insurance company of the owner would represent the driver in any action. If the driver had insurance under his own name, then that could be secondary insurance. Since you had serious injuries, you should look at your own policy to see if you have underinsured motorist insurance that is more than the insurance of the driver and owner. If so you can proceed under that for additional insurance. i.e. if the defendant had a $25,000 policy and you had more in underinsured motorist benefits $100,000.00 you can collect a possible additional $75,000.00 from your policy.
    Answer Applies to: New York
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Dunnings Law Firm
    Dunnings Law Firm | Steven Dunnings
    You would sue the driver and the owner of the car, if they are two different people. If the driver does not have his own insurance, then you might have a problem collecting a judgment against him/her depending on what assets he/she has to pay a judgment.
    Answer Applies to: Michigan
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A.
    Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A. | Paul L. Whitfield
    Always sue the owner and the driver
    Answer Applies to: North Carolina
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Andrew T. Velonis, P.C.
    Andrew T. Velonis, P.C. | Andrew Velonis
    Your claim is against the other driver. If he wasn't driving his own car, then it is the policy of the car's owner that applies.
    Answer Applies to: New York
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Law Office of William L Spern | William Spern
    You can only sue the owner and driver of a vehicle for your injuries that meet the threshold under MCL 500.3135.
    Answer Applies to: Michigan
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Kelaher Law Offices, P.A.
    Kelaher Law Offices, P.A. | James P Kelaher
    In Florida, you can't sue the policy holder, but you can if the policy holder is the owner of the car, which in all likelihood is the case. I
    Answer Applies to: Florida
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    T. Mack Taylor LLC | Mack Taylor
    Suit is filed against the person causing the injury, the insurance company is responsible for paying damages up to their policy limits.
    Answer Applies to: Georgia
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Lombardi Law Firm
    Lombardi Law Firm | Steve Lombardi
    When in a car, truck or motorcycle accident (a motor vehicle) the proper parties to sue include not just the driver (the operator) but also the owner. Owners are legally responsible for their permissive drivers. That means if the owner gives permission for another to drive their vehicle they are liable to those injured by the driver's negligence. So you sue both. As for the policy holder - it all depends. If the policy holder is also the car owner than yes, but being the policy holder isn't enough to be sued.
    Answer Applies to: Iowa
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
    R. D. Kelly Law Firm, P.L.L.C. | Robert Kelly
    In addition to suing a negligent driver, you can often sue the registered owner of the vehicle. There are various legal theories to support the vicarious liability of the owner of the vehicle (i.e. agency, family car doctrine, etc.) You should call an attorney to help you with that because there may be more avenues of recovery than appear at first glance.
    Answer Applies to: Washington
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Law Office of Ronald Arthur Lowry
    Law Office of Ronald Arthur Lowry | Ronald Arthur Lowry
    The defendant is the driver and/or his parents if the Georgia Family Purpose Doctrine applies. Also it is possible to sue the owner for negligent entrustment of the car to the driver if the driver has a bad driving history and you can prove the owner knew it. The question of liability insurance, stacking of liability coverages and possible UM coverage is a separate matter. You really need a lawyer experienced in PI claims ASAP. The situation you have described is very complicated.
    Answer Applies to: Georgia
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Shaw Law Firm
    Shaw Law Firm | Steven L. Shaw
    No, unless the driver had a separate policy from the one covering the vehicle (ie - friend borrows car, insurance for car is first, insurance for driver is additional). The facts you have laid out appear to ask if the same policy would cover two times. The answer to that is no.
    Answer Applies to: Washington
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Broad Law Firm, LLC
    Broad Law Firm, LLC | Donald K. Broad
    You will have to sue the driver, but you might be able to sue the policy holder/owner of the vehicle if you can show some sort of negligent entrustment. You should consult a personal injury attorney in your area.
    Answer Applies to: Indiana
    Replied: 2/17/2012
    Carter Boyle LLC | Nelson Boyle
    Based on what you said, you probably can sue the car owner or the parents for negligent entrustment or Under the family car doctrine. Also, there may be other insurance coverage. One possible other source of coverage is underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. The kid may live under same roof as one or more people with UIM coverage. You may have it or someone you live with might. Everyone should carry UIM coverage. It is a good way to make sure that you and your friends and family are covered in case of a crash.
    Answer Applies to: Colorado
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Law Office of Jared Altman
    Law Office of Jared Altman | Jared Altman
    You can sue the driver and the owner.
    Answer Applies to: New York
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Wilson & Hajek,LLC, a personal injury law firm
    Wilson & Hajek,LLC, a personal injury law firm | Francis Hajek
    The defendant is the driver and he would be the person sued. However, there may be more than one policy of insurance that covers the accident. An experienced personal injury lawyer explores all sources of recovery and can advise you on how to proceed so that all possible avenues of recovery are explored.
    Answer Applies to: Virginia
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Law Office of Russell D. Gray, PC
    Law Office of Russell D. Gray, PC | Russell D. Gray
    You should consult with an attorney to answer this question and make sure you are gettng all that you should get as compensation for this accident. To answer your question, you should sue the driver by naming the parents as parent and legal guardian of the driver. If you know of facts that show the parents were negligent in allowing the driver to use the vehicle then sue them individually as well. But talk to an attorney to make sure you know what you are doing.
    Answer Applies to: Utah
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Counard & Heilmann Law Office | Michael Heilmann
    In Michigan, a suit is against the owner of the car and the driver. One does not sue the policy. There are limits on most policies that limit the amount of coverage that the policy will cover. It is best to consult an attorney whenever considering an auto suit to avoid overlooking a potential theory of recovery. Good Luck.
    Answer Applies to: Michigan
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    The Olawale Law Firm | Emmanuel Olawale
    You can sue both. You may sue the driver for negligence and sue the owner of the car for negligent entrustment. To prevail on a negligent entrustment claim, you must prove that the owner of the car was aware that the errant driver had bad driving record or a propensity to drive recklessly. If you can't prove that, then you are stuck with suing the driver to recover your full damages.
    Answer Applies to: Ohio
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Hostetter & O'Hara
    Hostetter & O'Hara | Matthew E. Dumas
    The odds are that the policy holder is the driver's parent so the policy limits will be the same. You should look to your own auto policy for an under insured policy.
    Answer Applies to: Indiana
    Replied: 12/7/2011
    Kirshner & Groff
    Kirshner & Groff | Richard M. Kirshner
    The owner is primarily responsible. If not enough coverage you can also sue the driver if they have coverage.
    Answer Applies to: Florida
    Replied: 12/7/2011
Click to View More Answers:
12 3 4 Free Legal Questions